Category: JTBD

  • Driving Product-Led Growth with Contextual Marketing and User Onboarding Walkthroughs

    Driving Product-Led Growth with Contextual Marketing and User Onboarding Walkthroughs

    In today’s competitive business landscape, achieving fast-paced growth is a top priority for all businesses and apps. However, sustainable and measurable growth requires more than just expansion. It demands a strategic approach that focuses on user satisfaction, seamless product adoption, and the integration of contextual marketing. This article explores the principles of Product-Led Growth (PLG) and highlights the benefits of incorporating contextual user onboarding, mobile tooltips, and a digital adoption platform into your marketing strategy.

    Product-Led Growth, Explained:

    Product-Led Growth is a strategy that emphasizes delivering value through the product itself to drive user acquisition and retention. Companies like Slack, Calendly, and Dropbox have successfully implemented PLG strategies, transforming their products into the heart of their marketing efforts. This approach not only reduces costs associated with traditional advertising but also fosters a self-serve user experience that encourages organic growth and user referrals.

    The Power of Contextual Marketing and User Onboarding:

    Contextual marketing plays a pivotal role in the success of product-led companies. By prioritizing user satisfaction and providing in-app guidance and support, companies can lower the adoption barrier and enhance product adoption. Leveraging tools like contextual user onboarding walkthroughs and mobile tooltips, businesses can empower users to discover the product’s value on their own, leading to a faster realization of the “aha moment.”

    Why Integrate Context Marketing in Your Strategy?

    While content marketing has gained popularity, it’s clear that a single marketing approach isn’t sufficient to deliver the best user experience. This is where the Context Marketing mindset comes into play. Contextual marketing meets users at the right time, filtering information and providing tailored content to enhance engagement, retention, and revenue.

    Benefits of Contextual Marketing:

    1. Increased Engagement: Enhanced user experience leads to increased engagement. By focusing on user satisfaction, product-led companies prioritize customer feedback and develop features driven by user needs. This customer-centric approach boosts engagement, happiness, and the likelihood of user recommendations.
    2. Less Intrusive, More Organic: Contextual marketing tailors content to users’ preferences, delivering a personalized experience without compromising user satisfaction. Understanding user behavior allows companies to better target relevant material, increasing user conviction and driving action.
    3. Better Conversion Rates: Targeted marketing meets users’ specific needs, increasing conversion rates and reducing churn. Personalized marketing keeps users engaged, minimizing app abandonment and increasing the probability of recommendations.
    4. Enhanced Analytics: Contextual marketing provides valuable insights into user engagement, retention, and comprehension. Tracking key metrics such as revenue, user growth, and daily and monthly active users (DAU and MAU) helps quantify the impact of guidance initiatives and optimize marketing strategies.

    How to Implement Context Marketing:

    To harness the power of context marketing, consider integrating tools like Contextu.al into your strategy. In-app announcements, videos, guides, surveys, and tips can transform the user experience, providing contextual guidance and driving user retention. By prioritizing the user journey, you can leverage context marketing to its fullest potential.

    Conclusion:

    By embracing Product-Led Growth and integrating contextual marketing techniques, businesses can unlock sustainable and measurable growth. Leveraging user onboarding walkthroughs, contextual mobile tooltips, and a digital adoption platform, companies can enhance user experiences, increase engagement, improve conversion rates, and drive organic growth. Prioritize your users, optimize your marketing strategy, and take advantage of tools like Contextu.al to propel your app’s success. Book a demo with Contextual today and start driving product-led growth with a focus on user satisfaction and seamless product adoption.

  • Product Features and the RICE Score

    Product Features and the RICE Score

    “Impactful” product features are the backbone of every product-led company. “Impact” is one of the axes of the RICE prioritisation method – we revisit this valuable approach to getting the right tasks into your sprints.

    Like most product companies, we struggle to triage and prioritize the mountain of tickets into sprints. Luckily at Contextual we can use our own product to add contextual help instead of making even more tickets for engineering.

    Your Mobile and Web Apps are competing with other apps to get your users attention. You need each of your product features help the user get their Job Done (JTBD) – this means the right features at the right time and with minimum user confusion.

    In the routine of a product-led company, user journey mapping is a crucial task in order to ensure the greatest possible user experience. As there are a lot of things to consider in user journey mapping, prioritisation helps you be more organised with your product features, and it enables your App to become more impactful.

    But, (you may ask ????,) based on what criteria should you prioritize product features? A great place to start is the RICE scoring model, a prioritization framework that shines light on the value of your ideas. It helps your user journey mapping through four factors: Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort. Together, they form the acronym: RICE.

    RICE – Grain by Grain

    A good prioritization framework can help you see your product features in a new light, so that you can make sure you’re making a good decision for your company. So, when you make time for user journey mapping, having a system that allows you to see your product clearly and objectively comes to your advantage. RICE helps you evaluate the four main areas of any project idea. 

    Reach 

    How many people can you reach with a new product feature in a given timeframe? Will they benefit from it? The score in this case is the number of people you estimate to be reached by the new feature. 

    Impact 

    The Impact score represents, as its name suggests, the estimated impact the new product feature can have on the people you reach. For instance, you could ask: ‘How much will this feature affect product adoption/conversion rates?’ Or, ‘How will the user experience benefit from this?’

     

    As Impact is hard to measure, a multiple-choice scale is usually used for estimation purposes: 

    • 3 – massive impact
    • 2 – high impact
    • 1 – medium impact
    • .5 – low impact
    • .25 – minimal impact 

    Confidence

    A product-led company is always enthusiastic about great ideas and implementing them when it comes to product features. However, to be more realistic, the RICE scoring model advises that you factor in the level of confidence you might have with product features and their releases. In the long run, this estimation will help with product adoption among your users.

     

    Percentages score Confidence, as follows:
    100% – high confidence

    80%   – medium confidence

    50 %  – low confidence

    So, how confident are you about the reach and impact of a new product feature? 

    In order to achieve your product feature’s RICE score, you have to follow the following formula: 

     

    Reach × Impact × Confidence
    ___________________________
    Effort

    Why is Effort Crucial in Prioritization?

    Effort is the denominator in the RICE equation. This factor represents the cost a product-led company pays when implementing a new product feature.

     

    To quantify Effort in this score model, you estimate it in the same manner you do with Reach, Impact, and Confidence. In this case, Effort is estimated by analyzing the work one team member can do in a month. 

     

    The highest possible Impact with the least possible Effort is desirable when it comes to product features and their releases. By minimizing the time and human resources you put into a feature release, you gain them back for other areas of your product. 

     

    Effort is the most important out of the four RICE factors, as it can make or break a good idea. If you have great Reach and Impact, but the feature you envisioned requires most of your team and a significant amount of time, it might be better to rethink the idea or to use a different approach for it.

    How to Minimize Effort?

    That’s an easy question to answer: use Contextu.al!

     

    Of course we jest – there is so many features you have to implement and those require solid development work. But Feature Announcements and Guidance – in fact all elements such as videos that deepen user engagement can be helped by using Contextual.

     

    We strive to deliver product-led growth through announcements, guides, tips regarding product features, the onboarding process, and even feedback!

     

    With Contextu.al, you wouldn’t have to worry about hard-coding, because the Effort on your part would be minimal. Your top priorities are even higher priorities for us!  Putting more effort into implementing new releases is the thing of the past with us. 

     

    As an added bonus, with Contextu.al, the Impact and Confidence are also increasing. How, you ask? With us, you can get rapid feedback and measure results in no time. This will give you and your team the confidence to implement the desired changes later by hard-coding. 

     

    If you want to make your app fly, don’t hesitate to book a demo with us today! You won’t regret it. 

    Image Credit.
  • Onboarding guru Hulick on JTBD

    Onboarding guru Hulick on JTBD

    If you are a Product Manager, Designer, you have probably heard of onboarding guru Samuel Hulick. Even Customer Success people are aware of his tear-downs of early experiences in mobile and web apps. We’ve even emulated his approach with a few posts on this blog. 🙂

    In his latest “Value Paths” podcast, he laments a  misconstrued use of JTBD.

    “it is mind-boggling to me how much of Jobs To Be Done is sales and marketing-oriented rather than product-oriented”. 

    Contextual agrees with Hulick that the role of JTBD is most profitable when designing user experiences in your product. To read some of our other posts take a look, here, here and here.


    Situation, Motivation, Expected Outcome
    Source: HBR

    Hulick and his co-host (Yohann) attempt to refine JTBD with into Value Paths:“Path Design is how you get users from where they currently are all the way to the results that they care about.”

    It’s an interesting approach that attempts to corale many of the UX tasks that Product Teams undertake. Often when disciplines are new, they are a collection of activities and example-based approaches that people attempt to copy and reproduce in a cargo-cult like manner. Some activities become perennial best practice and others are just hacks that work for a short time or in a specific eco-system.

    A classic example of a hack in customer acquisition is spam – it works for a while but burns a lot of prospects and email filter systems constantly improved to stop the spam.

    In onboarding a more subtle “hack” is to try to capture ALL  the user’s details (do you really need their phone number?) at registration time before they can evaluate the product.

    Hulick: “Because if the user goes from the marketing website, to the onboarding third party plugin, to a sales survey, and then finally gets into the dashboard of your product, they might feel like they’ve gone through like seven different products along that way, where for the user it should feel like one continuous thing.”

    We’re Building Processes, Not Products

    This is a key insight: As product designers we are fixated on the features and functions of a particular module in the product. Per the example above “user registration”. All your attention and discussions about design “crowds out” that the user has a journey to achieve a result. Their trial of your product is a several A-to-B processes to assess if they “hire” your product, they will get their needs met.

    The podcast is worthy of your attention – here are some other powerful takeaways:

    “The key to path design is clarity on the end outcome (what the path results in). Every time the user engages with the product, it is within the context of the end outcome; so every interaction should be framed against it.”

    “There are infinite paths between “where users are” and “where they want to be.” Thinking of the critical pathway (the actions or stages the path must contain by necessity) is a compression algorithm — it compresses that near-infinite, unordered information into a single hierarchy.”

    You can find the Value Paths podcast:

     

  • Don’t build shiny objects

    Don’t build shiny objects

    Shiny objects are the features you release that arn’t supported by evidence the customer needs them.

    Airwallex’s Richard Jeremiah gives his perspective on how Product Teams should triage the firehose of ideas, feedback and opinions that all compete for precious sprint resources.

    In this short video, Contextual’s David Jones asks Airwallex’s Richard Jeremiah how they reduce down all features into the things that get built.

    He cautions that all product teams have a tendency to  “Veer off the path” :

    • moving away from (measurable customer) “outcomes” to “output”.
    • Teams often shy away from uncertainty to just making and releasing the new shiny objects.

    Outcomes vs Output

    For Airwallex and “Outcome” is focussed on customer value – this generally relates to an Objective or a Key Result in an OKR.

    In contrast, an “Output” is just the result of keeping busy. This is often features that are built in isolation from customer needs. In other words, output is that new shiny objects are something the team saw in a designer’s blog post or a competitive product.

    The challenge, Richard says is that “Outcome” is always way less certain than “Output” – an output is a known quantity, its just a matter of applying the resources and getting it released.

    An Outcome requires much more validation and rigour to verify:

    • Are we building the right things?
    • Are shipping valuable things for customers

    “Solving core customer problems is one of the great challenges of Product Development.” and “Get inside the head of the customer.”

    Triaging competing requests

    At the top of the product teams work funnel is a massive amount of options:

    1. Bugs to be fixed
    2. Technical debt to be re-factored. Scale and stability issues.
    3. Customer feedback captured in Zendesk etc
    4. Sales people claiming its imperative to implement ABC feature for XYZ prospect
    5. Team opinions
    6. New shiny objects and technologies
    7. validated feedback from customers
    8. results of experiments, hacks
    9. biased opinions from the product manager.
    10. and that old favourite….the fly-by CEO visit about something that’s been bugging them.

    There is a lot to be triaged and having something like RICE is fine, but it’s rudderless.

    Similar to what Zip‘s Patrick Collins advised the sprint needs to be filled with jobs that match to the customer and company imperatives.

    Specifically, Richard says: Strategy—>OKRs—>Measures that reflect toward an Objective or Key Result/Outcome.

    This top-down approach leads to using tools like Teresa Torres’ “opportunity solution trees” to ideate a range of possible technical and non-technical solutions.

    From there a weighting or “sizing” (Richard’s term) for each initiative is used as another filter for what makes the sprint.

    Summary

    The summary is that new shiny objects will always be tabled as solutions to product problems or opportunities. 

    Its correct – the shiny objects may be a terrific solution! But you MUST run them:

    a) through the lens of the customer’s needs

    b) the organisational priorities and OKRs.

    Banner Image credit

    Transcript

    00:03 – some of the lessons that i’ve

    00:04 – learned over my career but it’s very

    00:06 – very easy for

    00:07 – teams to veer off the path away from

    00:10 – outcomes towards output

    00:11 – it’s very easy to veer off the path of

    00:14 – experimentation uncertainty and trying

    00:16 – to nail down something that is certain

    00:18 – which is

    00:18 – in many cases look at this shiny thing

    00:21 – that i’ve built

    00:22 – and so trying to embed that into your

    00:25 – day-to-day

    00:26 – um check-in with the team i think so

    00:29 – anyway you’ve got these squads

    00:31 – how do you actually make sure you’re

    00:32 – building something that people actually

    00:34 – want

    00:35 – so yeah i mean that’s a that’s a big

    00:38 – question

    00:39 – um and it’s it’s really challenging i

    00:42 – think i think this is

    00:44 – you know making sure you’re shipping

    00:45 – value to customers is the

    00:47 – it’s one of the defining aspects of

    00:49 – whether you’re not gonna be successful

    00:50 – as a business

    00:51 – um i mean that’s that’s like are you

    00:54 – well suited as a business to do

    00:55 – to do that and all those stuff there’s

    00:56 – lots of other questions but one of them

    00:58 – is generally

    00:59 – are you solving a core customer problem

    01:01 – is

    01:02 – one of the great challenges of product

    01:04 – product development look our focus is

    01:07 – and my focus has been for a long time um

    01:10 – i i spoke previously it’s all about

    01:12 – focusing on the outcome

    01:14 – and not focusing on output that’s the

    01:16 – that’s the key

    01:17 – um it’s very natural as human beings

    01:20 – that we want to focus on

    01:22 – the output and not the outcome and one

    01:24 – of the reasons for that is output is

    01:25 – certain if you

    01:26 – if you apply effort you’ll get you’ll

    01:28 – have something to show

    01:29 – for it in terms of that you know it

    01:32 – could be

    01:33 – whether it’s a new page that you’ve

    01:34 – created whether it’s an experience

    01:36 – enhancement thing you’ve done whether

    01:37 – it’s a new feature

    01:38 – that’s available on your on your

    01:40 – platform you’ll have something to show

    01:41 – whether that thing matters or not that’s

    01:43 – the question right and so the

    01:44 – outcome is always way less certain and

    01:47 – we have a natural information as people

    01:49 – to want to you know shy away from that

    01:51 – uncertainty towards something that’s

    01:52 – certain

    01:54 – you have to be relentless in that focus

    01:56 – on the outcome

    01:57 – and that outcome could be whether it’s a

    01:59 – commercial outcome that you’re trying to

    02:01 – achieve by a meeting a need or a

    02:03 – customer need itself

    02:05 – you know that’s where your focus has got

    02:06 – to be so for me

    02:08 – trying to ensure that you’re shipping

    02:09 – value it’s all about

    02:11 – focusing on the outcome um and

    02:15 – and then you know if the outcome is

    02:17 – customer related

    02:19 – ah yeah so you sort of threw that in at

    02:21 – the end but it sounds like the most

    02:22 – important thing

    02:23 – so you you know what goes in the top of

    02:25 – the funnel

    02:26 – is a whole bunch of things you’ve got

    02:28 – opinions you’ve got sales people walking

    02:30 – back saying

    02:31 – you know they’ll come on board if you

    02:32 – actually develop this feature

    02:34 – uh you know you you know that sales

    02:36 – people are always dragging in between

    02:38 – you know bits of roadkill they say that

    02:40 – this is definitely the one that’s going

    02:41 – to

    02:42 – break the you know it’s really going to

    02:44 – the company will break out

    02:45 – you’ve got opinions around particular

    02:46 – things and then you’ve got disciplines

    02:48 – and customer

    02:49 – so how how are you feeling the top of

    02:51 – the funnel and then how are you triaging

    02:53 – that to get to this

    02:55 – output that’s actually used by a

    02:57 – customer

    02:58 – used by a customer yeah sure or even

    03:01 – valued

    03:02 – valued by a yeah yeah so

    03:05 – we um the general the general approach

    03:07 – and i

    03:08 – alluded to this before with you know we

    03:10 – have a strategy we have a set of okrs

    03:13 – that that then outlines um you know

    03:16 – here’s some some measures we’re going to

    03:18 – try and deliver over the course of the

    03:19 – quarter

    03:20 – and those measures reflect progress

    03:22 – towards an outcome or an objective

    03:24 – right what we take from there is trying

    03:26 – to understand

    03:27 – what are the various opportunities there

    03:29 – are to better serve the customer in a

    03:31 – way

    03:32 – that’s going to drive that particular

    03:33 – key result and

    03:35 – getting an understanding of that is all

    03:38 – about trying to get

    03:39 – under or inside the head of the customer

    03:42 – and there’s a lot of ways to do that

    03:45 – and you know you have to you want to use

    03:47 – all the tools you’ve got your disposal

    03:49 – sales people they are one of the tools

    03:51 – yes they have

    03:52 – they’ll have a lot to say that

    03:54 – oftentimes will be focused towards

    03:56 – a feature and a solution and they’ll

    03:57 – tell you about the solution

    03:59 – i mean one of the things is to try and

    04:01 – step back from that and say well hang on

    04:02 – what’s this solution actually trying to

    04:04 – achieve

    04:04 – and refer back from that some of it is

    04:06 – talking to those sales people all those

    04:07 – customers support people

    04:08 – and just taking on the journey to say

    04:10 – hey when you talk to your customers

    04:12 – next time they come up with a solution

    04:14 – can you ask why they want to do that and

    04:16 – actually try and work with your customer

    04:17 – support team to drive better customer

    04:19 – insights on the

    04:21 – the why for the customer as opposed to

    04:23 – what they want because

    04:24 – you know if you ask a customer what do

    04:25 – you want they’ll ask for you know

    04:27 – classic saying i want a faster horse not

    04:29 – i want a

    04:30 – motor vehicle so it’s about trying to

    04:33 – use

    04:34 – as many of the avenues that you’ve got

    04:37 – to get customer insight and that can be

    04:39 – you know talking to customers watching

    04:41 – customers engaging with customer support

    04:43 – team as i’ve said you can

    04:45 – um and in fact you can do that yourself

    04:47 – you know one of the things i used to do

    04:49 – a little bit of secret to get onto our

    04:50 – zendesk and start seeing what customers

    04:52 – are saying and trying to understand

    04:54 – what’s going on for them uh and again

    04:57 – you know

    04:57 – use your sales people they have a lot of

    04:59 – insight they’re coming to customers all

    05:01 – the time

    05:02 – but what you need to do is you need to

    05:03 – bring that back to try to understand the

    05:05 – customer’s motivations trying to

    05:06 – understand their needs

    05:17 – okay so that’s a discipline to actually

    05:19 – just basically look at it through the

    05:20 – lens and i guess what are using customer

    05:22 – interviews for that or

    05:24 – yeah so there’s a mix i mean the way

    05:27 – the way you know uh structured it and

    05:30 – the way we’re structuring it and while

    05:31 – it’s the framework we’re using is jobs

    05:33 – to be done

    05:34 – um we at seek

    05:37 – out a thing called a mental model which

    05:39 – is a more detailed deep dive than jobs

    05:41 – to be done into very

    05:42 – difficult tasks and that that is

    05:44 – essentially that mental model is

    05:45 – essentially a shared understanding of

    05:47 – the customer

    05:48 – and what is put against that mental

    05:50 – model the evidence that used to

    05:51 – construct that at

    05:52 – customer interviews uh customer support

    05:55 – insights

    05:56 – um you know experiment data behavioral

    05:59 – data on the platform like

    06:00 – basically any data point you can get

    06:02 – about the customer is used to help build

    06:03 – out that shared understanding of how the

    06:05 – customer

    06:06 – thinks facts their motivations what

    06:07 – they’re trying to achieve et cetera et

    06:09 – cetera

    06:09 – so is a mental model an intersection of

    06:12 – you know demographics slash personas

    06:14 – and job to be done is that is it so yeah

    06:18 – i mean you could segment the mental

    06:19 – model

    06:20 – based on the different personas um but

    06:22 – really it’s just a more detailed view

    06:25 – of jobs to be done you’re getting down

    06:27 – to very discreet tasks as opposed to a

    06:29 – job you know a job is

    06:30 – a manifestation of multiple tasks it’s

    06:31 – like subtasks and sub-sub-tasks it’s

    06:33 – really really granular

    06:35 – and it just essentially represents a

    06:37 – shared understanding of the customer how

    06:40 – we

    06:40 – understand the customer’s motivations

    06:43 – and what they’re trying to achieve

    06:44 – through

    06:45 – in this particular you know task

  • “Recipes” and “Jobs to be done” (JTBD)

    In another snippet from the interview with Matt from Bonjoro we discuss why “Jobs to be done” (JTBD) is so important to them.

    Bonjoro have a large inbound funnel of different triallers types – because their platform is horizontally applicable. However, they are optimizing for SaaS customers in Sales and Customer Service use-cases – they are high value and  high conversion probability. He discusses the conundrum here.

    It seems brutal but if Bonjoro try to craft onboarding for all users they will lose their valuable SaaS customers by diluting the flow.

    JTBD works, Personas don’t

    Conversely Bonjoro don’t find “personas” as terribly useful. A persona is great in marketing because you can speak to their needs – higher up the funnel.

    When it comes to Onboarding and Activation however, the user’s goals or “Jobs to be done” need to be displayed and aligned with the product goals.

    The perfect example of this is Bonjoro have a playbook of “recipes” for customers – this is effectively a cookbook of “Jobs to be done” for different customers. Just like Monday, these recipes are then baked into the product – they allow a user to get a Job Done quickly because they already learned about it in the marketing. “Show me, don’t tell me”.

    bonjoro-cares-for-customers
    Bonjoro is about customer care – at scale

    Product-led or Brand-led?

    I quizzed Matt on Product-led and his response was surprisingly insightful – for him its more about “Brand”.

    “Brand-led” is more his focus rather than Product-led because Bonjoro’s strong Design and UX DNA means they do “Product-led” things by default.

    I was shocked to hear him assert that the Bonjoro brand is of equivalent value to the actual functionality of the product.  Matt says that “Brand” is more important than startups realize.

    His view seems to be working, they hold a leadership positon in the “Personalization at scale” space? Their NPS is a fabulous 71.

    They are well respected, this is a very Product-led outcome but also their Brand is very, very fun, caring and recognizable.

    Stop “growth-hacking”

    Another cracker quote from the conversation was Matt’s plea to Stop “growth hacking”.

    He thinks most people arn’t skilled enough to do it, so ultimately get distracted by it.

    Bonjoro instead have a clear mission of personalizing and caring for customer. Matt says: “This has been lost, and it always used to be a way to compete and it’s got harder to compete “

    Take a listen to this and other posts with Matt, its informative and enjoyable.

    Conversation Transcript

    Matthew from Bonjoro 0:02
    longer form content. And so like, kind of white papers, but ones that you can take and “implant”.

    Matthew from Bonjoro 0:09
    So we’ve done this whole piece on our “Video files playbook” where we say: “use video, if you’re e-commerce or fashion, do this”, you know, “if you’re if you’re this, do this”. Yeah.

    Matthew from Bonjoro 0:20
    That has worked extremely well for us. And this goes back to a bit of the part around educating the market as well as trying to sell to it. Education has really worked well for us, and it has to be how we play out…..It’s still early days.

    David Jones 0:36
    Does that does that really worked because it’s a recipe based approach for those different sectors? Did you give them recipes?

    Matthew from Bonjoro 0:43
    Yeah, recipes are awesome.

    David Jones 0:45
    And the recipes are reflected in the product as well, too.

    Matthew from Bonjoro 0:48
    Yeah, exactly. Yeah.

    David Jones 0:54
    Has “Jobs to be done” been a recurring thing for you. It’s something that we refer to all the time internally. So, you know, is that a mainstay of how you view things?

    Matthew from Bonjoro 1:07
    Yeah, I think one of the hardest things is trying to get the whole team across (JTBD), the deep understanding of what “jobs to be done” is. It’s obviously way, way easier. It’s a way easier to categorize customers, by channel by industry by job title.

    David Jones 1:21
    Persona. The HubSpot kind of way: “this is, this is Mary, she’s 28. She’s a grad, she’s got a mortgage”. And, she wants to she wants to get somebody over the line because her KPIs are based around signups or “conversion to pay”. Do you still use that already? Or do you focus more on the job rather than the persona?

    Matthew from Bonjoro 1:47
    So the answer is we have to focus on “jobs to be done”, because the persona doesn’t work for us. So I think again, given the broad range where we operate, you know, and SaaS are one of our best customer bases but it’s still 20% of 100%. We have kind of like a lot of users who are not in that area. So but interestingly, you see more and more SMEs, poaching things from the SaaS mindset.

    Matthew from Bonjoro 2:17
    You see more e-commerce approach things from a SaaS mindset. So the mindset is more important than the company and the industry and potentially their business model. Everyone’s got leads coming in, are they approaching and going, what how many do we convert? What’s the lifetime value? What’s ARPU? What’s the CAC? This attitude is what works for us. So “what are the jobs that fulfill those points”?

    Matthew from Bonjoro 2:39
    Personas, we struggle with, and, you know, I just don’t do them anymore.

    David Jones 2:48
    Right, so you really are pinning it to the JTBD.

    David Jones 2:53
    What about product-led? In the last couple of posts I’ve talked about product-led type stuff. Have you glommed on to that particular bandwagon or do you see it as too high-level or common sense? What’s your thoughts?

    Matthew from Bonjoro 3:09
    Yeah, so I’d say it’s probably more common sense. Again: design first product first. It’s bit how we think anyway.

    Matthew from Bonjoro 3:22
    However, I think we’re building two things here. We’re building a product and we’re building a brand. And if you were to take the dollar value of those two things, I would say they’re probably about equal.

    David Jones 3:37
    right.

    Matthew from Bonjoro 3:39
    What I mean is given the stage of the company, our brand has a very good position in the marketplace and where we operate is very well known. We have like NPS rating is I think is 72. We’re really well respected and we’re building more of a name for ourselves as one of the leaders in this area of “personalization at scale”. And that gives you a lot of power to start to educate and to be a front runner.

    Matthew from Bonjoro 4:07
    It’s really important and I think brand…..we are quite “brand-led” and the fact that you’re doing a good thing here, we’re like, “Look, spend more time with customers”. It’s a good thing.

    Matthew from Bonjoro 4:20
    “Stop trying growth hack”, this kind of stuff works. It’s really nice positioning as well: people are kind of bouncing back to this (personalization), but more so it’s quite good timing. I think your product-led for sure. I think “brand” is a lot more important than maybe a lot of startups think what brand is.

    David Jones 4:36
    Thats funny, which was “stop trying to growth-hack”. And it goes back to that statement earlier that you had about: “automate processes, not people or not customers”, and that seemed to be tied into this kind of Northstar of making customer relationships personal but not getting bogged down in the weeds or crippling your scale. When you do that.

    Matthew from Bonjoro 4:59
    This is probably where a lot of people get crippled by the “growth hack” thing. Where everyone’s trying to hack their way and do these things. And a lot of people (to be honest) don’t have the experience to kind of do them or pull them off or what works for one company will not work for you.

    Matthew from Bonjoro 5:15
    So I think this idea of also having the recipes…the stuff you use in your business, the “plug and play” and they work.

    Matthew from Bonjoro 5:22
    You look back was always like “build a marketing list”, you know, and it wasn’t that hard to do. And so if you can find out what these pieces are, people can essentially step in, “plug and play”. And when you when you rely on the team, the culture of relationships, nothing greater than that way. Like everyone could do that. Well, every (company/team) culture around that base can do that. You know, you will still get stars, you know. “Everyone can do Twitter, not everyone’s good on Twitter” and “not everyone should be allowed to Twitter”.

    Matthew from Bonjoro 5:51
    I think we’ll see a same thing here – even if everyone started using this (personalisation at scale), you still have people who “stand above” and they “stand above” because the team, relationship show that “they do care”.

    Matthew from Bonjoro 6:00
    So how do you give them easy ways to show that online?

    Matthew from Bonjoro 6:04
    This has been lost, and it always used to be a way to compete and it’s got harder to compete – face to face. So how do you bring that back and how do you tell you when do and how you again, make it simple, I think I think that’s kind of the key.